On Feb 5, 2019, at 10:40 AM, Mohit Sethi M <[email protected]> wrote: > > One could use the same argument. Those only interested in implementing > EAP-TLS will be forced to wait while all other methods are being updated.
Yes. Sorry, but that's a good thing. Revving one EAP method while ignoring the others is a major problem IMHO. > Anyhow, I don't expect the other document to take 18 months. I look > forward to your submission (and reviewing it once it is available). It should be small. And the WG should be incentivized to publish it quickly. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
