John wrote:

>That is probably the correct behavior to standardize, i.e., something like
>"Implementations MUST NOT set the L bit in unfragmented messages, but MUST
accept unfragmented messages with and without the L bit set."

I'm for the strict approach. Anyway some implementations don't adhere it.
The sentence above narrows the behaviour to a non-ambiguous while requires
to support all kinds of existing behaviours thus it looks like the most
exact form of the requirement.

Cheers,
Oleg

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:44 PM John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Alan wrote:
>
> >I've done a quick check.  On reception, FreeRADIUS accepts the L bit for
> any type of message.  It doesn't care >about fragments, just that the
> length is correct.
> >
>  >For sending packets, FreeRADIUS sets the L bit only if it is sending
> fragments.
>
> That is probably the correct behavior to standardize, i.e., something like
>
> "Implementations MUST NOT set the L bit in unfragmented messages, but MUST
> accept unfragmented messages with and without the L bit set."
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
>
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to