John wrote: >That is probably the correct behavior to standardize, i.e., something like >"Implementations MUST NOT set the L bit in unfragmented messages, but MUST accept unfragmented messages with and without the L bit set."
I'm for the strict approach. Anyway some implementations don't adhere it. The sentence above narrows the behaviour to a non-ambiguous while requires to support all kinds of existing behaviours thus it looks like the most exact form of the requirement. Cheers, Oleg On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:44 PM John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Alan wrote: > > >I've done a quick check. On reception, FreeRADIUS accepts the L bit for > any type of message. It doesn't care >about fragments, just that the > length is correct. > > > >For sending packets, FreeRADIUS sets the L bit only if it is sending > fragments. > > That is probably the correct behavior to standardize, i.e., something like > > "Implementations MUST NOT set the L bit in unfragmented messages, but MUST > accept unfragmented messages with and without the L bit set." > > Cheers, > John > > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu >
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu