Device identifiers, how certificates get provisioned, their contents, and where the keys are stored don’t seem in scope for this TLS-based EAP types spec. This seems like more of a BCP thing or a topic for MADINAS IMO.
From: Eliot Lear<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 10:09 AM To: Alan DeKok<mailto:[email protected]>; EMU WG<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Emu] Question for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types-03 Hi Alan, On 01.07.21 15:23, Alan DeKok wrote: > TEAP is one solution, but I don't think everyone is going to move to TEAP > overnight. It would be nice to have solutions for existing (and deployed) > EAP methods. Perhaps I lost the plot, but what do you propose? Eliot
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
