Considering the time passed and the low participation in the Vienna meeting,
another presentation wouldn't be a bad thing. That would allow for face-to-face
discussion. If you're interested, let me know how much time you would like.
Yes, EAP-FIDO expired. That is indeed a result of the author being busy. It
might also, to a lesser extent, be caused by the concern that the FIDO
environment can't be tied to the underlying operating system in a
straightforward manner for functions such as bringing up the network, if I
remember that point correctly. I don't know if Janfred was every able to chase
down the real-world feasibility of the scheme. It remains in our charter and
open to being reinvigorated if he or others make progress on the document.
-Peter
On 10/22/25, 1:00 PM, "Michael Richardson" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Peter Yee <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I'm not hearing a lot of requests for agenda time during the EMU
> session in Montreal. We are a mere two weeks away, so if you have
> something you want to present in front of the group, now is the time to
> speak up. Please let me know at your earliest convenience.
In Vienna, I talked about draft-richardson-emu-eap-onboarding-04 from which
eap-arpa (now with the RFC editor) was split out.
There seemed to interest in the room to adopt.
Do I need to present again about it?
EAP-"FIDO" (still hate the name) expired in March.
I imagine due to higher priority interrupts on the authors.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> . o O
( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
