-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hiya, On 06/09/14 07:38, Eliot Lear wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In the early days fo perpass we had lengthy discussions about the > tension between privacy and ability of security systems to reduce > spam. Below is an article from a gentleman who used to work at > Google, which I thought this group might find interesting. > > https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html That's a good posting all right. And I agree that anyone who's trying to offer a solution in this space has to meet the really hard challenge of producing a system that doesn't allow spam to take over. But recall that this list is not here to design or pick a solution, but rather to see what bits of IETF work might enable some solutions to evolve successfully. So it is valid to e.g. say that some key management foo or message format bar work would be needed and valuable to standardise even while we don't have a solution available for the spam problem. Cheers, S. > > Eliot > > > > _______________________________________________ Endymail mailing > list [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUCv9LAAoJEC88hzaAX42iSUcH/i4nqy5yxnSp4Yjs+bqZb61D gMrpS4KPC4gjDUQsuwaorMnpeyqStoInVGvJu+ZTMr5gC2uYLwMIKsDCWocZXfER J28Co/UyBvu/FIvaNrn1GcNcGGjzd7DyiaiPa0n+pEN9uDKiZOeC97gaNd7PgHl1 DDaEQhWZpcadcyjD4y95WXHPaXwOiw56oTDzXNnW1xDGXYr1qLJLZhE4UNDUGqsp qVXZ4qiwqFTm8JCnHayJ68OoYfm0ZB+KynGRgH/T9DEYBctv4yVo2AH028btTKxE baKDNuuIy/EPPps+gd0V2G/4w+umYja/QYI0mr0qdLARp8QS6pkXaN/8wE9nZBY= =6Njx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Endymail mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail
