Hi Stephen, While I think it would be fun to talk with the gentleman about his bitcoin thinking, the key part that I intended for this group was the situational analysis involving spam and how bad guys behave.
Eliot On 9/6/14, 2:34 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 06/09/14 07:38, Eliot Lear wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > In the early days fo perpass we had lengthy discussions about the > > tension between privacy and ability of security systems to reduce > > spam. Below is an article from a gentleman who used to work at > > Google, which I thought this group might find interesting. > > > https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html > > That's a good posting all right. And I agree that anyone who's > trying to offer a solution in this space has to meet the really > hard challenge of producing a system that doesn't allow spam to > take over. > > But recall that this list is not here to design or pick a solution, > but rather to see what bits of IETF work might enable some > solutions to evolve successfully. So it is valid to e.g. say that > some key management foo or message format bar work would be > needed and valuable to standardise even while we don't have a > solution available for the spam problem. > > Cheers, > S. > > > > > Eliot > > > > > _______________________________________________ Endymail mailing > > list [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail > > > _______________________________________________ > Endymail mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Endymail mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail
