Hi Oliver, Thanks for the suggestions.
Oliver Propst <[email protected]> wrote: ... > First I want to really recommend the person who compose the > final document to read the articles in the wiki [1] as those > contains the latest edits, including grammar. Tobi reviewed the changes on the wiki, and I've imported his edits. ... > The article about GUADEC that are included in latest PDF are much longer > and more detailed then the current version on the wiki [2]. Frankly I > don't think people are interested in reading such long, detailed report > about an event that took place one year ago. I think its sufficient to > provide a shorter version such as the one on the wiki, if people are > interested in more details there is always the news achieves (we could > refer to that) [3]. I've modified the GUADEC article slightly, to make it a bit more focused and easy to digest. I do think a longer version is desirable, though - the whole point of the Annual Report is to find information about what the GNOME project did in 2013. If we cut it down to the bare bones, it won't contain very much of anything, and some of the details we do include won't be meaningful. Why mention the names of our keynoters without including details about who they are or what they actually spoke about? > In the release article I find this sentence troubling: > "Wayland is the next generation technology for display and input on > Linux." > > Its very strong wording that I don't think its an accurate, description > of the situation, sounds more like a PR statement from a company > department, I do not think we need to play that role. I don't think the statement is inaccurate at all. If you look at who is using Wayland, or going to be using Wayland, it is absolutely accurate. Allan _______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
