On Jul 23, 2014 3:13 AM, "Oliver Propst" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andreas Nilsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 07/17/2014 11:27 AM, Oliver Propst wrote: > >> > >> > >> In the release article I find this sentence troubling: > >> "Wayland is the next generation technology for display and input on > >> Linux." > >> > >> Its very strong wording that I don't think its an accurate, description > >> of the situation, sounds more like a PR statement from a company > >> department, I do not think we need to play that role. > > > > > > That sounds correct to me. It is the next generation tech for display and > > input on Linux after all. > > What else would be? > Its not really a matter if its *right* or wrong, but if its an > accurate description of the situation.
Seems fairly accurate, there is no other display server that has gained any traction other than those related to Android and IOS. > > I think this wording implies that there is none alternative in this > area which there are [1]. We are usually quick to notice when the > press treat us unfairly so I don't think we should play (or even risk > to) the same game. Humm.. Mir is only associated with canonical products. The people working on Wayland are more or less associated with X and is supported by everyone else. Media people can make news on anything, real or perceived. I agree on being cautious, but not sure if it is completely warranted here. What alternative would you propose ? Sri > > 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir_%28software%29 > -- > -mvh Oliver Propst > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
