Hi Sébastien, So, by promoting the gnome.org project hosting platform, you'll get more > _experienced_ developers that can more easily contribute to other GNOME > modules and become core GNOME developers. >
I reckon the main thing to be weary of would be figuring out a reliable way to predict the amount of abandoned projects GNOME could end up hosting. At the moment, we already have a few too many abandoned projects, but I think this problem could be reduced if we include clear instructions on how to take over maintainership of an abandoned module somewhere (obvious) on the wiki. > Of course it's important to not accept every random project, as it is > explained in the wiki. But I think some projects would benefit from > being hosted on gnome.org. > Are you thinking of any specific projects? If so, it would be useful to know. What do you think? > It's an interesting idea. I'd like to get a better sense of what lead you to arrive at it: Could you elaborate a bit on how moving LaTeXila benefitted GNOME (and vice versa)? Magdalen
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
