Hi Sébastien,

I just had a quick look and saw there are two pages relevant to this which
could be updated.[1,2]

Magdalen

[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing
[2] https://wiki.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleRequirements


On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Magdalen Berns <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Sébastien,
>
> > I reckon the main thing to be weary of would be figuring out a reliable
>> way
>> > to predict the amount of abandoned projects GNOME could end up hosting.
>> At
>> > the moment, we already have a few too many abandoned projects, but I
>> think
>> > this problem could be reduced if we include clear instructions on how to
>> > take over maintainership of an abandoned module somewhere (obvious) on
>> the
>> > wiki.
>>
>> Only active projects are accepted. Some of them will become
>> unmaintained, that's a fact of life.
>>
>
> Indeed, but if there are a lot of inactive projects then paying to host
> them could become expensive.
>
> > Are you thinking of any specific projects? If so, it would be useful to
>> > know.
>>
>> I just have GtkSpell in mind, a small library to add spell checking,
>> currently hosted on SourceForge. I already tried to convince the
>> maintainer some years ago to move to gnome.org, but failed. But now it's
>> a new maintainer.
>>
>> But instead of contacting potential projects, I'm more thinking about
>> talking about it on planet gnome or having the information easily
>> accessible on the wiki.
>>
>
> Perhaps a wiki page linking from "development resources" could outline the
> process?[1]
>
> > It's an interesting idea. I'd like to get a better sense of what lead you
>> > to arrive at it: Could you elaborate a bit on how moving LaTeXila
>> > benefitted GNOME (and vice versa)?
>>
>> It benefited GNOME in the sense that I contribute and maintain other
>> GNOME modules now (GtkSourceView, gedit, …). And I was more inclined to
>> contribute since I was already on the gnome.org platform.
>>
>> At the beginning when latexila was hosted on gnome.org, I didn't feel
>> that I was a member of the GNOME community. But by reading the planet
>> GNOME, by subscribing to some mailing lists, by being listed in the
>> weekly statistics written by Frédéric Péters, etc I felt more and more
>> part of GNOME. I then did a GSoC, etc.
>
>
> That makes sense. It seems like a good idea we explain the process of
> adding modules to git.gnome.org, publicise that a bit and see what comes
> of it then. I also reckon it's worth having a page which explains the
> process of becoming a module maintainer too and perhaps these sort of
> references would be good to link from the maintainers corner (which could
> then link to the landing page)?[2]
>
> Magdalen
>
> [1] https://wiki.gnome.org
> [2] https://wiki.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner
>
>
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Reply via email to