Magdalen Berns <[email protected]> wrote: > Twitter management seems like quite a lot for one person. Why not share the > load of managing it among a few people?
Twitter alone isn't too much work. I've managed the channel in the past, and it was pretty easy. Reasons to have one owner per channel: * you get a consistent voice across messages * the channel owner can schedule activity, to ensure regular posting, as well as coherence of the channel as a whole * it avoids errors, since one person has an overview of what has been posted (so you don't get multiple people posting the same message, for example) * because someone is maintaining the channel, they are able to reply to questions and discussion Allan _______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
