On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 16:55 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > Magdalen Berns <[email protected]> wrote: > > Twitter management seems like quite a lot for one person. Why not > > share the > > load of managing it among a few people? > > Twitter alone isn't too much work. I've managed the channel in the > past, and it was pretty easy. > > Reasons to have one owner per channel: > > * you get a consistent voice across messages > * the channel owner can schedule activity, to ensure regular > posting, > as well as coherence of the channel as a whole > * it avoids errors, since one person has an overview of what has > been > posted (so you don't get multiple people posting the same message, > for > example) > * because someone is maintaining the channel, they are able to reply > to questions and discussion I agree with Allan abouting consistency in the tone & schedule of the posts. That said, we would definitely love if one could reply to the comments & @replies under one's own identity esp. if they encounter some misconception or misinterpretation.
Parth prth on irc://irc.freenode.net & irc://irc.gnome.org > > Allan > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
