On Monday 07 May 2012 02:06 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
----- Original Message -----
i can't see any justification for the 'gluster' prefix,
as this is only additional /service/ provided by the project,
and Gluster now is a part of the RHT.
I believe there needs to be an indication which service this is about.
If we will support provisioning other storage types which also have volumes
then we'd want a way to differentiate.
However, isn't there a way to simply add gluster as the name space?
i.e. somthing like: /api/gluster/.../volumes ? (instead of 'cluster' as it is
redundant imho)
A gluster volume is a cluster level entity, and hence
"/api/.../clusters/{cluster:id}" seems like the right parent URI for the
gluster volumes collection resource.
On 05/06/2012 09:56 AM, Ori Liel wrote:
We are introducing Gluster functionality into ovirt-engine
REST-API.
Gluster entities are 'Volumes' and 'Bricks'. The question is:
should
they be called: 'volume'/'brick' or 'gluster_volume/gluster_brick'?
(with or without the 'gluster' prefix)?
There was a short conversation about this in a patch in Gerrit:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,3918
Since there are conflicting opinions, I'm bringing it here for a
resolution.
Thanks,
Ori.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
--
Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
