On 05/07/2012 07:06 PM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2012 02:06 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:

----- Original Message -----
i can't see any justification for the 'gluster' prefix,
as this is only additional /service/ provided by the project,
and Gluster now is a part of the RHT.
I believe there needs to be an indication which service this is about.
If we will support provisioning other storage types which also have
volumes then we'd want a way to differentiate.
However, isn't there a way to simply add gluster as the name space?
i.e. somthing like: /api/gluster/.../volumes ? (instead of 'cluster'
as it is redundant imho)

A gluster volume is a cluster level entity, and hence
"/api/.../clusters/{cluster:id}" seems like the right parent URI for the
gluster volumes collection resource.

that's true for all other root entities as well:
- VM is DC/cluster level
- template is DC level
- disk is storage domain level
- network is DC level
- hosts are cluster level (for now)

yet all of them have their own root collections as well.

I think glustervolumes seems safest/most reasonable for now (either at cluster level or root level as well)




On 05/06/2012 09:56 AM, Ori Liel wrote:
We are introducing Gluster functionality into ovirt-engine
REST-API.

Gluster entities are 'Volumes' and 'Bricks'. The question is:
should
they be called: 'volume'/'brick' or 'gluster_volume/gluster_brick'?
(with or without the 'gluster' prefix)?

There was a short conversation about this in a patch in Gerrit:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#change,3918

Since there are conflicting opinions, I'm bringing it here for a
resolution.

Thanks,

Ori.

_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

--

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

Reply via email to