Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it explicitly, so I'll just go with that.
If someone feels strongly against, please reply. Ori ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Pasternak" <[email protected]> To: "Moti Asayag" <[email protected]> Cc: "Ori Liel" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 2:26:10 PM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID On 05/15/2012 05:31 PM, Moti Asayag wrote: > On 05/14/2012 02:19 PM, Ori Liel wrote: >> > No decision about the name of the parameter yet, and this is blocking me. >> > >> > Names that were suggested so far: >> > >> > * flow-id +1 -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
