On 28/05/12 21:31, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 05/28/2012 02:35 PM, Ori Liel wrote: >> Quite a few people liked flow-id, and no one objected to it >> explicitly, so I'll just go with that. >> >> If someone feels strongly against, please reply. > > I still like 'label' better. > it doesn't have the context of a unique id, and is much more correct to > what this is - allows the user to label a command (or a set of commands). > but also doesn't imply it's unique in any way (i.e., it's like a "tag", > just a better, non overloaded term for it). >
I think that flow-id is confusing. This id has nothing to do with flow, it can aggregate multiple commands and it is not associated with a specific user flow. Correlation-Id is a common name for such Id, we took it from the terminology used in JMS queues, but Microsoft and Oracle are using CID too. * http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=23842 * http://sharepoint.microsoft.com/blogs/GetThePoint/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=353 * http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B14099_19/integrate.1012/b25709/com/oracle/bpel/client/CorrelationId.html >> >> Ori >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael Pasternak"<[email protected]> >> To: "Moti Asayag"<[email protected]> >> Cc: "Ori Liel"<[email protected]>, [email protected] >> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 2:26:10 PM >> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] REST-API: Exposing correlation-ID >> >> On 05/15/2012 05:31 PM, Moti Asayag wrote: >>> On 05/14/2012 02:19 PM, Ori Liel wrote: >>>>> No decision about the name of the parameter yet, and this is >>>>> blocking me. >>>>> >>>>> Names that were suggested so far: >>>>> >>>>> * flow-id >> >> +1 >> > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
