On 22/11/12 00:02, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 11/21/2012 10:53 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote: >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Moti Asayag" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:36:58 PM >>> Subject: [Engine-devel] Report vNic Implementation Details >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is a proposal for reporting the vNic implementation details as >>> reported by the guest agent per each vNic. >>> >>> Please review the wiki and add your comments. >> >> >> While we're making the change is there anything else we'd want to >> report - MTU, MAC (since a user might try to override), etc ? >>> >>> http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/ReportingVnicImplementation > > iirc, the fact ip addresses appear under guest info in the api and not > under the vnic was a modeling decision. > for example, what if guest is using a bridge, or a bond (yes, sounds > unlikely, but the point is it may be incorrect to assume ip-vnic relation. > michael - do you remember the details of that discussion?
I'd love to know what drove this modeling decision. The use case above is not a typical use case. We know we won't be able to present the guest internal network configuration accurately in some scenarios but if we cover 90% of the use cases correctly I think we should not let perfect be the enemy of (very) good ;) > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
