On 11/22/2012 12:02 AM, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 11/21/2012 10:53 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote: >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Moti Asayag" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:36:58 PM >>> Subject: [Engine-devel] Report vNic Implementation Details >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is a proposal for reporting the vNic implementation details as >>> reported by the guest agent per each vNic. >>> >>> Please review the wiki and add your comments. >> >> >> While we're making the change is there anything else we'd want to report - >> MTU, MAC (since a user might try to override), etc ? >>> >>> http://wiki.ovirt.org/wiki/Feature/ReportingVnicImplementation > > iirc, the fact ip addresses appear under guest info in the api and not under > the vnic was a modeling decision. > for example, what if guest is using a bridge, or a bond (yes, sounds > unlikely, but the point is it may be incorrect to assume ip-vnic relation. > michael - do you remember the details of that discussion? >
indeed, unfortunately i can't recall exact discussion nor can find this thread in ML, but afair this was the argument. -- Michael Pasternak RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
