Hi James, Thanks for your answer. My intent with the "Engines Collaboration" was to continue and stimulate the discussion on "DRY and engines", more than specify how to achieve inter-engine communication at this moment.
You are right: what I suggest is not a minor change. I think I follow up your suggestion: define the idea in greater detail and even prototype it. I would like to have people's input about it: does anybody feel that it could be worth to implement an inter-engine communication? Ideas? Mauro -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ engine-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-users-rails-engines.org
