Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Hi Andy-- > > I'm one of the folks working on the debian packaging for enigmail. > > This might be worth reporting on the Debian BTS as well. Would you > like to do that, or shall i? If you have reportbug installed, you > can just run "reportbug enigmail" and it should walk you through > the process.
I'll do that - I only paused because reporting against testing is sometimes frowned upon - especially when there are new releases in the wings. > On 02/01/2013 01:53 PM, Andy Ruddock wrote: >> I've moved to Debian wheezy and unfortunately enigmail fails to >> check signatures. Debug output produces the error : >> >> Cc[NS_IPCBUFFER_CONTRACTID] is undefined at line 2302 in >> enigmail.js >> >> Trying to sign mail produces the error : >> >> Cc[NS_IPCBUFFER_CONTRACTID] is undefined at line 1634 in >> enigmail.js > > your e-mail's User-Agent header suggests that you're using iceape > (aka seamonkey) 2.7.11 -- is that right? Yeah I'm using iceape, but the same errors occur when using icedove - which is to be expected as they both use the same enigmail package. > unfortunately, i don't see seamonkey 2.7 listed on upstream's > compability list at all: > > http://enigmail.net/download/download-static.php > > it seems to skip from 2.5 to 2.8 :( > >> Debian reportbug suggests that a new version is available in >> experimental - but it can't be installed because that would break >> iceape. > > right, enigmail 1.5 wants iceape 2.14 or later, which isn't > packaged for debian yet. > > Patrick, Olav, other enigmail folks -- i'm pretty sure 2.7 is the > version of iceape/seamonkey that we'll be shipping in debian. Is > there a specific reason this version was skipped in the enigmail > compatibility lists? > > --dkg Thanks for the quick response. -- Andy Ruddock ------------ [email protected] (GPG Key ID 0xB0324245) _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
