-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2013 10:41 AM, Patrick Fleming wrote: > > > On 03/07/13 17:50, John Clizbe wrote: >> Gary Baribault wrote: >>> On 03/07/2013 03:12 PM, Jean-David Beyer wrote: >>>> Now is the time for all good peanuts to come to the aid of >>>> their snoopy. >>> Ok so we won't reply, not even to say your sig is good. >>> >>> >>> Gary Baribault Courriel: [email protected] GPG Key: 0x685430d1 >>> Signature: 9E4D 1B7C CB9F 9239 11D9 71C3 6C35 C6B7 6854 30D1 >> >> Which it was, BTW. >> >> Gary, what you're calling Signature, most everyone else calls a >> fingerprint. >> >> -John > > Wasn't this the signature? : "Now is the time for all good peanuts > to come to the aid of their snoopy." I thought it was very good.
No, that was the message. I knew if a GPG signature was included, it would mean the gpg-agent was running correctly, and if it did not, it was not. Later, I realized I could have just sent the message to myself. > > And the gpg signature appears to have been valid as well. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRO40LAAoJEBZthAoMYQyLKz0H/3XOhbBtFN7oHya1MhkWUuER 9UEkTAWNVSIaVPH9TavCeVQ4DSZMFvmRVzAmwJCrP0ZgqKUGI5yPjPUsflUZz9ay GnJf0NjSBLxuhopJ7EaWxIjxWHH0g0e6uOdElS7EvOwPxpFEIDVMCRPGWnuuKMPp OYooem7CZp/TbUS/XV3PvoV9byhk62paqeiIJpl0b0Lnw0mdyEwJmNRjtxhawERJ LLUAgL38DbZmvW9Pshr0ZK4R+qlMfKwh6728HgznM93wFeKO+5qUb7pJ5o0pheJF hd8wvRAqLquEDgTDubKpuUxlF9OqArKOPUpf0v1y/nAXMVjYN1rtxlWCVstpPOA= =LaBW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
