-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/9/2013 9:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 06:00 PM, David wrote: | On 3/9/2013 3:12 PM, Doug
> Barton wrote: |> On 03/09/2013 12:01 PM, David wrote: | On 3/9/2013
> 2:47 PM, Doug |> Barton wrote: |> |> The act of sending the message
> and then |> validating the signature |> provides reassurance that
> your local |> mail server(s) are not |> mangling it in transit. | |
> | | True. |> But I got the impression that the test was to see if
> signing | |> actually worked not to see if the signature was
> mangled. | |> One other tiny issue, since a while back now enigmail
> does not |> sign the messages in the drafts folder. :) | | | | You
> should report it to Bugzilla.
> 
> No, it's a feature. Check the e-mail archives for more info if
> you're interested.


Thanks for the information. I missed seeing that.

- -- 

  David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=Whgi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to