> Would it be worthwhile having enigmail pass straight to GnuPG 2.1 ? No.
GnuPG 2.1 seems like it should be a minor revision (after all, it’s just a .1 increment), but quite a lot has changed: the addition of ECC, the new keybox format, changing how supporting programs work, and more. Like any substantial change, we don’t want to push this on to users prematurely. Let’s let the early adopters discover bugs in 2.1 and let 2.1 mature a bit. Once that happens we can have the discussion about whether Enigmail should require 2.1. Even then, though, I imagine it’ll be a few years before we require 2.1 or later.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
