If the wizard takes users to 2.x then I cannot see an issue. With old equipment 
can the user remain on 1.x with an old version of enigma?


Ian


On 06/02/15 10:08, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> will create _some_ support burden. Is the code to support 1.x in 
>> Enigmail really *that* difficult to work with/work around that it 
>> justifies taking on these burdens now, rather than some time down
>> the road when more people have already transitioned?
> Ah, the broccoli argument.
>
> "I hate broccoli, but it's on my plate, and Mom and Dad won't let me
> have ice cream until I finish all my food.  So do I want to eat the
> broccoli now or later?"
>
> My vote: eat the broccoli now and enjoy the rest of your meal, rather
> than try to enjoy your meal while dreading the broccoli.
>
> Also, users have had eight years to transition.  What are we supposed to
> do, wait another seven years?  Letting Enigmail users know today, "in
> about a year you'll have to be using GnuPG 2.x with Enigmail," is hardly
> ripping the rug out from beneath people's feet.
>
> I'm not in any way worried about this transition.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> enigmail-users mailing list
> enigmail-users@enigmail.net
> To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
> https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to