-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 20.03.15 00:31, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2015-03-19 13:36:17 -0400, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: > >> I pushed a number of changes that remove support for GnuPG 1.x >> from Enigmail. The main objective was to remove anything >> concerning passphrase handling from Enigmail, as GnuPG 2.x does >> this by itself. > > gpg 1.4.x can also do the passphrase handling by itself, as long > as --use-agent is passed to it in each invocation (and the agent > is running). > > Do we want to explicitly drop 1.4.x anyway, or just say "we don't > support 1.4.x without using the agent"?
Support for 1.4.x is dropped now entirely. There are also other differences e.g. in the output of GnuPG 1.4.x when accessing keyservers that I don't want to support anymore. - -Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVC8t2AAoJENsRh7ndX2k7JEIQALNQvXG0F9Z/Gx5aLe3s3Vap OW3KNOjJWmp2+yCRRsO+opod6R0vDRBvgWTcI1lyaAM5EOdZomoA+djOS/xRtPRJ Jm6pSxzhxwY7Ci16XNwuMjejn9mATG5MB0vHMwWazTqj+NGrn+ULoo5tLnxoC0yX T8gkKzYwxyGLRMA89cQs29SED31eOgjpYNDr1NmGB4hLAvG6YKea9KFjagVEKJu+ 4F2FaEiIJ0VxyEXaBzH2GuuCZIv9UJbb7Q6KnnoZsdtH8gdrEB9yC7J8vMvv8AKD d2+cg1cSeaeAkJlbTNl+sjT1Hlk8o8ntWdlamn1frJomsOuDH0NuOPYDGacsjNmp jGxAeOfqdeZ/WDW2bKKKcBvP2eQ87lu4Fqe8Rtu8MJSE+MVptJOhz/MRo3VWcpqn Zyb2rr35dm8FHHflR9ZwsseaVMs0kxzgvrqgl1ENVlJ6N69AFWCk6pryO61AmCwd YRx7ZT3CgbKl0psZ76oAk2HlSvzNhciQfkHnLbch6Bm1BBVEgsTaKRCHJkEy7CIV Quf0Dbj23tsueL1JhPqJBw4S8ygkDNF9JYZXN+8JTK5Qm6Vn1/s43ZjW8h1WVnm0 KMgNZXNqTM5DL6Pf7VaoCv3rpQbChX97oEQDGcv9/QJR74g0eMLb6BFf85dhFeHy VFJeWh+NeKDkFkknIopa =veoA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
