-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 16.04.15 20:24, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> package/enigprefs-service.js mentions that it is dual-licensed
> MPL-1.1 or GPL, but it doesn't indicate which version of the GPL.
> Other dual-licensed parts of the codebase are explicitly GPL 2 or
> later (or triple-licensed MPL-1.1|GPL-2.0+|LGPL-2.1+)
> 
> Adopting this patch (or something like it) would clarify that the 
> intent for the GPL versioning in package/enigprefs-service.js.
> This patch proposes that the clarification should be
> MPL-1.1|GPL-2.0+.
> 
> I'm clearly not the one to make this decision, but it would be nice
> if the copyright holders could agree on a clarification :)

Thanks for spotting this, the patch is applied.

- -Patrick

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=vJCw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
enigmail-users@enigmail.net
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to