On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Brunschwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 16.04.15 20:24, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > package/enigprefs-service.js mentions that it is dual-licensed > > MPL-1.1 or GPL, but it doesn't indicate which version of the GPL. > > Other dual-licensed parts of the codebase are explicitly GPL 2 or > > later (or triple-licensed MPL-1.1|GPL-2.0+|LGPL-2.1+) > > > > Adopting this patch (or something like it) would clarify that the > > intent for the GPL versioning in package/enigprefs-service.js. > > This patch proposes that the clarification should be > > MPL-1.1|GPL-2.0+. > > > > I'm clearly not the one to make this decision, but it would be nice > > if the copyright holders could agree on a clarification :) > > Thanks for spotting this, the patch is applied. > > - -Patrick > I thought Mozilla's MPL 2.0 was supposed to replace tri-licensed MPL1.1/GPL/LGPL-code... Onno
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
