On 5/14/2015 7:38 PM, David wrote: > On 5/14/2015 7:25 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >>> And *if* this had been an decrypted message to one of the people on your >>> "secret but public" keyring? The only part of this that would not >>> readable to "us" would be the actual message. >> >> Assuming he didn't use anything like remailers, Tor, dead drops and the >> like, sure. If your point is "make sure to address the metadata issue" >> then it's well-taken; if it's not, I'm not sure about what you're >> getting at. >> >>> Which means? Your recipient would be public. Why? Every site that the >>> message passes through keeps a copy. Including what I posted here. >> >> Oh, come on. You don't know what sites a random email passes through, >> and you don't know what their policies are. You're just trolling. >> >> <puts on list moderator hat> >> >> Stop trolling. >> >> <takes off moderator hat> > > > You're the moderator? Gee. And I thought that you were one on the > trolls. Like these guys. > > Sorry about that. I'm out-of here then.
I was going to sign off your list but your certificate is bad. Is it okay to accept your bad cert to sign off? -- David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
