Re: [Enigmail] No more "Untrusted Good Signature"s

Mike Acker Sun, 20 Sep 2015 05:03:13 -0700

I'm not sure you need 3 greens though,-- a message for which the signature verifies becomes "authenticated",-- i.e. we are3 assured the message is from the person we think it is from --

the key is when the signature authenticates you, perforce, have also verified integrity ( the accuracy of the document content )

the option of course is PRIVACY, aka encryption

I think two greens are enough, then:

On 09/20/2015 06:51 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:

On 20.09.15 05:06, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> (Forgive the HTML: this is one of the few times where I think it’s
> worthwhile. This email uses color to convey information.)

> So, while relaxing with a good stogie, I started mulling over the
> UX problem of communicating information about encryption status,
> signatures, validity, and more. I got nowhere, which is when I
> decided to burn it all down and start from a clean sheet of paper.

{ snip }

--
/Mike

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Re: [Enigmail] No more "Untrusted Good Signature"s

Reply via email to