if you want a third light it could be for the trust level established for the senders key:



not signature: pgp wasn't used
unknown: message is signed but we have no information about the signer
untrusted: messages is signed by a person we recognize but we are not sure if her or she is trustworthy
marginal: marginal trust -- ( I don't like this one )
trusted: full trust -- we are willing to accept authentication and trust level information from this source
ultimate: show for messages signed by local user usually in the SENT box


> > On 09/20/2015 06:51 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: >> On 20.09.15 05:06, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> > (Forgive the HTML: this is one of the few times where I think it’s >> > worthwhile.  This email uses color to convey information.) >> >> > So, while relaxing with a good stogie, I started mulling over the >> > UX problem of communicating information about encryption status, >> > signatures, validity, and more.  I got nowhere, which is when I >> > decided to burn it all down and start from a clean sheet of paper. > { snip } > > -- > /Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > enigmail-users mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: > https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

--
/Mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to