|
I agree. it is critical
that good terminology be adopted and then held constant so that
people can learn to use it. historically IT had a bad habit of constantly trying new words in their attempt to communicate with the un-initiated. that made matters worse: people will get hip in their own due time . On 09/23/2015 04:03 PM, Robert J.
Hansen wrote:
...but still maintain that there is a functional difference between no signature (nothing to see here; move along) and failed or faked signature. Either of the latter may need to be investigated. The former need not be, unless you were *expecting* a signature and didn't get it.I'd very much like for this discussion to continue, but I also want some finality to the discussion, too, so that Patrick can have a fixed target to implement (instead of trying to make it match an ever-changing discussion). It's really easy for good discussions to turn into bikeshedding arguments: at some time the points have all been made and a decision needs to be reached.So. Assuming for the moment the power of moderating this discussion -- I think we should aim for, shall we say, October 1 to close this? On October 1 I write up a sense-of-the-list, give it to Nico and Patrick, and then we call it done until/unless someone can come up with new and compelling arguments? -- /Mike |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
