On 01.06.16 19:52, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I agree that keeping some state (or being able to infer state) about > whether your peer likely has your key would be a useful thing. I'm not > sure what the right rules would be to make this relatively seamless and > not-confusing, though.
One thing is clear: If the local installation has already received encrypted mails from this address, it is no longer necessary to send the own key again. Not sure how to implement this, this would require some sort of mini-addressbook. Ludwig
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
