On 17 Mar 2003 16:52:25 +0100 Cristalle Azundris Sabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:

> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >   I think that was just about everybody's plan, really, with the sole
> > >   reason for it not having been implemented yet being that we've never
> > >   sat down and defined the IPC between the background-handler and its
> > >   clients?
> > 
> > well i looked at it more as being just a shared canvas and the file
> > manager is just "yet another client" using the shared desktop
> > canvas... :)
> 
>   Isn't that what I just said?

i read it more that evidence would provide the shared canvas... :)

>   On a side-note, ev can do the old-style faux desktop thingie that
>   efm did until then, but I never considered that a permanent solution.

for now thats fine :)

-- 
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile Phone: +61 (0)413 451 899    Home Phone: 02 9698 8615


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! 
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and 
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to