On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 16:24, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Monday, 10 November 2003, at 22:04:57 (+0100), > Kim Woelders wrote: > > > I have E running with imlib2 (configure --with-imlib2) as well as > > imlib1. The port is done mostly by changing the code to the imlib2 > > API and using preprocessor macros to map these to the imlib1 API > > when using that. dox isn't ported yet. The imlib2 as well as the > > imlib1 versions seem quite stable to me, but I cannot imagine that > > there aren't bugs in both. I'm not really sure what to do with > > this. Commit it? Post a patch? Does anybody have an opinion? > > By all means, commit that fucker. :-) > > Having just made a good solid release, I see no reason not to go ahead > and make massive changes to CVS as needed. Besides, the more we test > the new Imlib2 stuff, the better.
I just checked E's CVS page at Sourceforge and you haven't committed it yet, Kim.... Why not ?? :-) Hall ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
