On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Nathan A. Smith wrote:
> So, > > What is the solution to this autoconf problem? > > Nasa perhaps PMK : http://pmk.sourceforge.net/ (also look at the related links...) ;) Vincent TORRI > > > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 21:06, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:13:36 -0600 (CST) "Ibukun Olumuyiwa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > babbled: > > > > > Please take a look at this bug and comment: > > > > > > http://xcomputerman.com/bugs/view_bug_page.php?f_id=0000024 > > > > hmm - i blame autoconf. i'm beginning to get sick of working around it all the > > time. trust me - next minor auto*splat* version this will get fixed and some > > other fundamental issue pop up. i know there isn't much else out there - but > > maybe we should explore other options? > > > > one day i'll get so pissed off i'll just go back to Makefiles and say "if u want > > it to build for you - port it and write your own god damn Makefile!" > > :) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
