Daniel Hulme wrote: > > > > Lower Priority > > -------------- > > Entrance: > > * XDMCP > > On the subject of XDMCP support for entrance, I am looking at how xdm > does it, and it seems the logical way. How much structure/code can we > reasonably pinch from them (both under licensing restrictions and > people's sensibilities), or do we have to re-invent the wheel? > > I mean, it would be feasible (from a coding point of view) to just > rewrite a few callbacks and dump a load of the files into CVS to be > refined into a more E-like worldview later (e.g. changing the code to > use edb configs rather than text files), but I can imagine not many > people would feel comfortable with this. The problem is, if we rewrite > the code independently it will probably end up looking very similar > anyway (stucturally). > > If anyone has any feelings on this, I'd appreciate it if they let me > know before I get into coding. > Thanks, > Daniel
Isn't xdm under the XFree86 license? It and the E license are compatible, non-GPL license's as far as I know. You just need to include copyright info from code you use when you move it across. For once, I think this is an easy answer... -- Kevin ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
