On Friday, 13 February 2004, at 16:04:00 (-0600),
Nathan Ingersoll wrote:

> I would have to agree about the GTK docs. I never found them to be
> very easy to use beyond the most trivial things. The new ones look
> slightly better, but if you don't know the name of a specific
> widget, it can be a pain to track down the functionality you want.

Bingo.

> Agreed. And related to your other message. I like the way doxygen
> does class heirarchies, we just need a better way to apply them to
> structs.

Yup.  And its use of cpp also needs to be improved.  LibAST uses a
system closer to real objects than the average struct, and it relies
heavily on macros to make the code more readable, abstract out certain
things, and minimize repetitive typing. :-)

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "No weapon formed against us shall prosper.  All those who rise
  against us shall fall.  I will not fear what the devil may bring
  me; I am a servant of God."                                 -- Petra


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to