On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:38:34PM -0400, Michael Jennings wrote: > > Not trying to be pedantic here, but for the sake of clarity, RPM's are > not distro-specific, exactly. The RPM's as I do them are as > distro-agnostic as they can be, in fact. But they do require certain > versions of certain shared libraries which may cause incompatibilities > with some distros. However, a simple rebuild from the SRPM will > almost always fix those. Dynamically linked binaries, by definition, > cannot be as portable as source (as I'm sure you know, having done > the Solaris packaging). > > HTH, > Michael
We could also build LSB compliant packages for people that have issues with the other RPM's. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Nathan Ingersoll \\ Computer Systems & Network Coordinator | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ http://www.ruralcenter.org | | http://ningerso.atmos.org/ \\ Rural Health Resource Center | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
