On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 01:09:19 +0200 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> > So why not rename the function to ecore_evas_x11_window_get() or something
> > similar? I know it's massive api breakage, but it should be trivially easy
> > to fix throughout CVS. I guess I just don't fancy the idea of having two
> > different functions in the same file that do the exact same thing.
>
> Hehe. Could do this. Although with the current naming its really obvious
> that they only work for a particular engine (same prefix).
> And who knows whether the functions will always have the same
> functionality.
>
> That's my reasoning here, does anyone else have an opinion on his? :)
i definitely agree with til :) there is no guarantee that they will always be
the same.
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
熊耳 - 車君 (数田) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
