On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:58:17 +0100 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 18:54]:
(B> > Implemented desktops as a list, instead of an array. Moved
(B> > e_desk_current_get, e_desk_at_xy_get to e_zone_desk_current_get and
(B> > e_zone_desk_at_xy_get.
(B> >
(B> > Anyone against?
(B>
(B> You should wait for raster and Andy to comment on this, IIRC there was a
(B> good reason for *not* using a list.
(B
(Bthis data struct is unlikely to change often - it likely will change a few times
(Bwhen a user sets something up then remain static for just about ever. it is
(Bsimpler to access, address and manage an array of these - it can be changed, but
(Bbeing 2d in nature an array massively simplifies access. if it was 1d it'd much
(Bcloser to "much of a muchness" but being 2d means u need lists of lists... and
(Bthat just becomes painful unless u REALLY have a need for it. :)
(B
(B--
(B------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$BMg9%B?(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTokyo, Japan ($BEl5~(B $BF|K\(B)
(B
(B
(B-------------------------------------------------------
(BSF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
(BRead honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
(BDiscover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
(Bhttp://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
(B_______________________________________________
(Benlightenment-devel mailing list
([email protected]
(Bhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
