On Tuesday, 01 March 2005, at 00:43:28 (-0500), Mike Frysinger wrote: > this little rant is unrelated to the actual bug mentioned ... the > fact that there's ugly 'test: integer expression expected' doesnt > affect the missing e17 config script (the real cause of build > failure)
I wasn't referring to the build failure. I was referring to the fact that getting rid of the ".pre_XX" in exchange for ".00X" did not manage to solve the "integer expression expected" problem...which, according to raster, is why he did it in the first place. > and really, that ugly output is a moot point ... the old versioning > schema had the same problem, except it'd complain about > '_pre'/'_alpha'/whatever not being an integer expression See above. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Even if it takes forever to win your heart and your love and your devotion, I know it's going to be worth the wait." -- Amy Grant, "Say You'll Be Mine" ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
