On Friday 11 March 2005 12:13 pm, Michael Jennings wrote:
> Are you certain?  I believe the .la files contain dependency
> information for those systems that require it.  The .a files are
> certainly unnecessary, though, and can be easily omitted using the
> --disable-static parameter to autogen.sh/configure.

i think we're talking about the .la files for the loaders, not the main 
'libImlib2.*' files ... in the normal course of things, if you link against 
libImlib2.so and have it load say jpeg.so, jpeg.la and jpeg.a are not 
needed ... the .la file is only used by libtool at build time which is why 
you always want libImlib2.la ...

i dont think it's possible at all to link against the loaders directly is it ?  
so shouldnt the loader's .a and .la files be prunned from the normal `make 
install` target ?
-mike


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to