On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:31:10 +0200 Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > No. TRUE should definitely not be defined as !FALSE. > Booleans in C are a pain. Personally, I avoid using them entirely, as I > think they are more trouble than helpful, when they are not intrinsic > to the language. agreed - to me it's all 1's and 0's anyway :) bool is very artifical as it ends up an int one way or another :) > How about stdbool.h, i.e. bool/true/false? I don't have much experience > with the portability of this one, but it's at least standardized thing. > > Anyway, if nobody else is concerned, I'll just crawl back under my rock :) nice rock mate! :) now where did i put mine... *crawls back under his rock* -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 裸好多 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本) ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
