Didier Casse wrote: >On 11/3/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >*snip* > > >>Why? Maintained, yes. Per author, no. Separately from CVS, >>definitely not. Having it public encourages others to pick up where >>the original author left off. CVS is first and foremost a >>collaboration tool. Removing code from CVS stifles collaboration and >>contribution. >> >> > >I actually totally agree with Michael on all this. If the modules' >authors use CVS, we can keep track of the codes: we know what they >changed at which point in time and also able to give feedback on what >to improve. People watch those CVS commits and sometimes highlight the >"fishy" commits on the devel-list and hint a more appropriate way of >doing things. Well this is a nice principle and we can all learn from >it. > >
Please read my suggestion here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=enlightenment-devel&m=113100021920877&w=2 If everyone agrees I can set this up ASAP. -Blake ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
