Hey, On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Davide Andreoli <d...@gurumeditation.it> wrote:
> 2018-01-27 12:40 GMT+01:00 Felipe Magno de Almeida < > felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com>: > > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:20 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > <barbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Jean-Philippe André < > j...@videolan.org> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > > > [snip] > > > > >> So what I think is that this is a great tool that you provide here, > but > > I > > >> doubt other languages than Python will adopt this straight away. > Unless > > we > > >> start working on a new binding, maybe? > > > > > > well, point is you can create a new binding just replacing the text > > > files that are the template... so maybe even c++ and c# could be > > > changed to use that without major issues... > > > > > > not sure if Felipe thinks maintaining an eolian generator on his own is > > worth. > > > > > > as for python dep... it will come with meson anyway. > The Python dep is only for compilation anyway. > We will test pyolian with a test generator. Not sure about bindings yet > > because we need some flexibility that templating might not be enough, > > for example for JS which generates registration functions etc. "Loops" > > are weirder in that case, but indeed maintaining more code is not > > exactly my goal. > > > > The template engine is really powerfull, it have access to the whole eolian > api and db. And provide various control structures (if/then/else, for > loops, > macros, variables, etc...) > It should be able to generate whatever complexity you need. > I was thinking the complexity may be too big for the templates generation, but then again it may be just a matter of more templating? Anyway if pyolian works out for esoteric bindings, then this is absolutely for the best. One generator in one language could be easier to maintain. :) Also, the C++ generator is VERY hard to maintain (for C devs), so that could help. > > > I do think pyolian will help with new ideas that are going to be easier > > to put in practice, which we might not even have seriously considered > > yet. > > > > @Davide: Could you create a EFL branch with pyolian inside? I think > > this should not be outside EFL IMO. > > > > pyolian (and the template generator) is aready in the EFL master branch. > > look at src/scripts/pyolian/ for them, there is also a quite complete docs > in README.md > > and look at src/scripts/gendoc/ for an example usage. > > Let me know when you try it :) > > > > > > > -- > > > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > > -------------------------------------- > > > Mobile: +55 (16) 99354-9890 > > > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Felipe Magno de Almeida > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > Best regards, -- Jean-Philippe André ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
