On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 07:56:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:24:31 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: > > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:15:49PM -0400, Christopher Michael wrote: > > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 03:35:44 -0400 (EDT) Enlightenment CVS > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > > > > > > > What was the reasoning for this? why would one need to pass the > > > > path to an module icon explicitly? (if you want to do your own > > > > icon in a dialog for a different dialog you can always do the > > > > dialog by hand?) > > > > > > > > <-- snip --> > > > > > This was requested by Andy so that modules config dialogs could > > > show their icon in the border of their config dialogs. I think > > > consistency was his main goal and also so users can identify > > > easily what config dialog is for what module. > > > > > > If it is a problem I can roll it back and change the modules back > > > to previous way of showing the E icon on the border of the config > > > dialog. > > > > > > dh > > > > > > I *think* he meant that e already knows where the modules icon is, > > so you you shouldn't need to pass th path in. That is, it should > > just use the icon by default. > > that's kind of what i was thinking - but then you would need to pass > the module handle in - you need to pass something in at any rate so e > can figure it out. Void pointer called data, works everywhere else. B-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
