Mike came up with the idea of sub projects, which sounds very good to me.

On 06/11/2018 10:17 AM, Hermet Park wrote:
Imho, base infrastructure (eo/eina/efl) / rendering (evas, ector) / layout
(edje, eet) /  core system (ecore family) / window system / widgets (elm) /
sys-helpers (efreet, eldbus, eeze... ) is enough ...

Probably true, however, i would like to have them in even smaller projects, so its easier to find relevant tickets for one specific subsystem ... :) I think a project with 10 tickets is easier to maintain and look at instead of 100 tickets ... :)


But, your proposal is not arguable neither. I agree on it.

The problem is, sometimes issues aren't independent by modules nor clear to
list up...

That is the reason i want to use projects tags now, you can add multiple projects (like efl-ecore efl-evas efl-elementary).


anyway, good to go!

Waiting until this evening, but i am going to prepare things ... :)

Thank for your feedback!


Greetings,
   bu5hm4n



On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Marcel Hollerbach <[email protected]> wrote:

Okay, we need to step back with this a bit.

The problem is, workboards are quite unmanagable, and clearly not made for
the amount of tickets we are having.

So here a new proposal:
I create the following projects:

efl-ecore (additionally: elput & ecore_*)
efl-eina (additionally: evil emile)
efl-eo
efl-eolian
efl-edje (additionally: ephysics embryo)
efl-evas (additionally ector)
efl-elementary (additionally: ethumb, emotion & elocation)
efl-eldbus
efl-eio
efl-efreet
efl-sys (additionally: eeze)
efl-eet

Each project gets automatically added efl to it. The tags can be added to
each ticket.

Opinions?

Greetings,
    bu5hm4n


On 06/11/2018 05:54 AM, Hermet Park wrote:

good to go.

On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 12:47 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz <
[email protected]> wrote:

This seems like something which would help people more easily find issues
that they can contribute to. Perhaps a 5th workboard for something like
'main loop' could also be added?

On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:32 AM Marcel Hollerbach <[email protected]>
wrote:

Hello,

as Mike said, here my proposal for handling bugs for the upcoming

release:


i) Every bug will get a difficulty assigned either Easy, Difficult, or
Impossible, this is to ensure that new people, and people that don't
know the subsystem or context very well can also help bugfixing.

ii) I am going to create 4 new workboards:
- primitives: Stuff that has its root problems in eina, eo, (low in our
software stack)
- interfaces: A Bug is caused due to the movement to a different
namespace, refactoring into new classes, or changes related to new efl_*
code / classes.
- rendering: A Bug is located in the engine code for some

protocol/platform

- widgets: Your usage of elm widgets broke somewhere between efl-1.20
and the current state.

iii) If you work on a bug, claim it for you. If a other bug sneaks in
between, or there is no time in the next week or so: Document your
findings, and remove your name from the assignee field on phabricator,
so someone else might work on the bug.

Any objections ? For Monday I am planning to go through the bugtracker
trying to assign difficulities, and workboards.

Greetings,
      bu5hm4n


------------------------------------------------------------

------------------

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel





------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to