Hi Stephen, What can I do to start getting things going in a new direction. The advantage with Linode is that then I can give access to multiple individuals to access the linode manager and other aspects of the server.
Are we going to go forward with this change? I am very willing to sponsor all this. On 13/12/2018, 18:38, "Stephen Houston" <[email protected]> wrote: A few months ago Mike set up a test instance of gitlab on a server for us... After testing and the like, I set up a slowvote on Phab that covered 4 options: Gitlab with new infra Gitlab with current infra Phab with new infra Phab with current infra The overwhelming support was for new infra. As in every single vote except for one wanted new infra. The majority also wanted gitlab, but for the sake of this email, that is irrelevant. The arguments against new infra, having it sponsored, cloud, etc... keep being that if someone leaves the project, or the owners of the servers changes, or policies change, or etc... that we might lose access. To me this seems like an incredibly poor argument right now especially considering that we have been experiencing this very thing and even worse with our own current infra. The problems I have seen are that we: A. Failed at maintaining the physical aspects of our server. B. Keep having continued downtime over and over and over again. C. Can never get in touch with or get a response from our server admin in any kind of remotely adequate timeframe. Insanity is often said to be defined as doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result. It is time to have an open mind to the needs/wants of this community and make a change. Stephen _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
