On 10/01/2019 01:51, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Its almost 5 months since we released 1.21 and I stepped down.
>
> When talking with people I got help offers on the release handling but
> no-one stepped up to fully take a lead on this. I start to get the
> feeling that this might need to be handled with a smoother transition of
> knowledge and work.
>
> Jonathan and Mike both offered help and others also expressed that they
> would be willing to do their share towards a release. I count on you to
> make this work :-)
>
> To get back to time based releases we should get working on 1.22 soon
> (and not block ourselves with $FEATURE not being ready right now)
>
> The 3 months based schedule has been putting to much load onto the
> project with release stuff. At least that is my opinion. After 1.22 is
> out we should think about increasing this. Maybe 4, 5 or even 6 months?
> Up to discussion.
>From a distro perspective i'd tend to agree that longer would be better,
especially with the amount that needs to be repackaged every release on
our end due to eo changes. When we get to a point were no one is
breaking eo anymore either because its done or people just aren't
working on it anymore then going back to 3 monthly is probably more
manageable.
--
Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net
Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek
SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
