Hello. On 10.01.19 10:24, Simon Lees wrote: > > > On 10/01/2019 01:51, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Its almost 5 months since we released 1.21 and I stepped down. >> >> When talking with people I got help offers on the release handling but >> no-one stepped up to fully take a lead on this. I start to get the >> feeling that this might need to be handled with a smoother transition of >> knowledge and work. >> >> Jonathan and Mike both offered help and others also expressed that they >> would be willing to do their share towards a release. I count on you to >> make this work :-) >> >> To get back to time based releases we should get working on 1.22 soon >> (and not block ourselves with $FEATURE not being ready right now) >> >> The 3 months based schedule has been putting to much load onto the >> project with release stuff. At least that is my opinion. After 1.22 is >> out we should think about increasing this. Maybe 4, 5 or even 6 months? >> Up to discussion. > > From a distro perspective i'd tend to agree that longer would be better, > especially with the amount that needs to be repackaged every release on > our end due to eo changes. When we get to a point were no one is > breaking eo anymore either because its done or people just aren't > working on it anymore then going back to 3 monthly is probably more > manageable.
Fair enough. Let's go for a longer cycle and see how that works for all parties and we can refine later. regards Stefan Schmidt _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
